mark ballard

Mark's Investment Blog

This blog is intended to keep clients and friends current on my investment management activities. In no way is this intended to be investment advice that anyone reading this blog should act upon in their personal investment accounts. There are other significant factors involved in my investment management activities that may not be written about in this blog that are equally as important as the things that are written about that materially impact investment results. Neither is this blog to be construed in any way to be an offer to buy or sell securities. To be notified via e-mail when new posts are made, CLICK HERE TO SUBSCRIBE

Ranking Stocks for Investment – Fourth in Series

Our Ranking

Our proprietary investment analysis system is able to rank the 1200 companies I keep in our database according to several factors. These factors lead us to six ranks based upon traditional investment concepts: Earnings Growth, Financial Strength, Value, Momentum, Quality and Fundamentals. Each of the rankings combines several financial ratios that reflect each of the above investment concepts, and they are chosen based upon years of analysis that show that these specific ratios provide me with a clear picture of how the company fairs under each concept. They are ranked from 100 (best) to 1 (worst) on a relative basis to their industry and to the S&P 1500.

Fundamental Ranked Companies

In the first three entries in this series, we looked at Quality Ranked companies , Earnings Growth Ranked companies, and Financial Strength Ranked companies. Today, we are going to look at another of our concept-based ranks: Fundamental.

Our Fundamental Rank is the most complex of the ranking systems and encompasses 87 financial ratios related to the Balance Sheet, Income Statement, Statement of Cash Flows and the Effectiveness of Company Management. The ratios rank the companies against their industry as well as the S&P 1500.

Based upon this, below are a selection of companies from our database that are ranked Fundamentally Strong with a rank above 90 and a history of strong bear market performance plus those ranked Fundamentally Weak with a rank below 60 and a history of weak bear market performance.

Fundamentals Company Name Fundamental Rank 3-yr Avg Return
Fundamentally Strong
Dollar General Corp
Fundamentally Strong
Intel Corp
Fundamentally Strong
Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd
Fundamentally Strong
Eli Lilly and Co
Fundamentally Strong
Mercury General Corp
Fundamentally Strong
Progressive Corp
Fundamentally Strong
QuinStreet Inc
Fundamentally Strong
Ross Stores Inc
Fundamentally Strong
Boston Beer Co Inc
Fundamentally Strong
UnitedHealth Group Inc
Fundamentally Weak
Apogee Enterprises Inc
Fundamentally Weak
Devon Energy Corp
Fundamentally Weak
General Electric Co
Fundamentally Weak
The St. Joe Co
Fundamentally Weak
Limoneira Co
Fundamentally Weak
Phillips 66
Fundamentally Weak
Raytheon Technologies Corp
Fundamentally Weak
Splunk Inc
Fundamentally Weak
Valero Energy Corp

A review of the chart above will indicate that the companies ranked as Fundamentally Strong performed better on average over the past three years than those ranked as Fundamentally Weak. So, lets look at the scatter graph for a visual analysis:

high and low quality 4

Looking at the graph, it is easy to conclude that the companies ranked Fundamentally Strong have out-performed those ranked Fundamentally Weak on average over the past three years.

Why Is This Important Now?

In the first entry in this series, I mentioned that the Federal Reserve had begun to discuss tightening monetary policy, an event that has in the past led to stock market corrections and sometimes full bear markets. Given their recent statements, it is prudent to know how companies will perform when there is not a significant stimulus pushing their stock prices higher.

Investment Strategy

In the normal course of portfolio management during this period in time where we have been warned that monetary tightening is in the plans, we want to book the gains on the companies that show the least ability to withstand a bear market and focus on the companies that have the best ability to withstand a bear market. We do not want to see the gains we have made be lost by not monetizing them when the market tells us it is time.

What’s Next?

In Part Five of this series, we will look at what happens when we combine the ranks discussed in the first four parts of this series.


Contact Us

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.